Last night I went out and saw the Hobbit movie, and I have to say, for a movie it is OK, but for a book adaptation it is terrible. If you have never read the books then you would probably enjoy the movie, but any true Tolkien fan is going to have a problem with the movie. If you thought LOTR was distorted the Hobbit is distorted even moreso. I recognize that for movie adaptations some things have to be left out, and sometimes dialogue has to be added in to fill in holes that might have been filled by 3rd person narration in the book, but which is of course absent from the movie. But what I do have a problem with is when they change the story, and add things to it that run contrary to the story itself.
On the upside, the visual aspects of the movie are very good. They do a good job rendering the charactars, costumes, and settings. That being said, there were so many gross distortions in the movie that by the time it was over I had a headache, and before it was over I was wanting it to end already. Let's go over a few:
1) There was no condemnation of greed or divine right in the book. It is a well known and established fact that dwarves are greedy, but not in a dishonest or slinky way, they just like treasure and making stuff with their hands. Everything they have the work for, and they use their skills to generate wealth. There was no talk about wealth being a source of corruption that attracted the dragon. The dragon doesn't care, he just wants treasure, and also, I don't want to hear any movie producer talk about greed or negatively about having wealth. Also, there was nothing in the Hobbit about divine right to rule, or that being a bad thing. If you read Hobbit and LOTR by themselves you get the impression that there is a Supreme Being and that he has a plan (as opposed to the evolutionist backdrop that a lot of other authors opt for), but you don't see him referred to directly unless you read the Silmarillion.
2) The elves of Mirkwood never paid homage to the dwarves, they are wood elves, they don't involve themsleves in much and they don't care.
3) Dwarves and elves had mutual distrust and dislike well before Smaug came, and the coming of Smaug had jack all to do with that. The problems between them came about as a cumulative effect from a series of events in the 1st age. Thorin doesn't have anything against the elves, he just doesn't care for them because they're elves, and they feel the same about him.
4) Azog the orc was never in the Hobbit, nor did he chase the dwarves, nor was he even alive at that point. Azog actually can be found in the Apendices at the end of ROTK, and the story was quite different there. The dwarves aren't trying to get revenge on Azog, they just want their stuff back.
5) The Great Goblin was killed in his throne chamber by decapitation.
6) The trolls caught the dwarves a few at a time as they came to check on what was taking Bilbo so long. Most of them were caught before they could put up a fight, and it was Gandalf that confused and delayed them not Bilbo.
7) Bilbo never fell down a pit or shaft in the caves, he simply got lost and separated, and he came across the ring while groping in the dark.
8) Radagast was not in the Hobbit, nor was Galadriel or Sauroman, although that meeting was alluded to.
9) When the dwarves are chased up the trees by wolves Gandalf throws down burning pinecones, and the wolves are running around helpless until the orcs come and put fires beneath the trees, but at that point the eagles come to save them. There is no fighting there or falling off the cliff, and no one gets down to fight the orcs or wolves. Also the way the wolves are depicted in all of the movies is wrong.
10) Sauron did not make the spiders in Mirkwood, nor were they a new addition to the forest, nor was the title "Mirkwood" a new one.
On the other hand, one thing they did right was show Sauron as an actual physical being rather than a floating eye (as they did in the LOTR movies). I hated that floating eye so much. That thing was so stupid, and it had jack all to do with the books. The books never say that he was a floating eye, that was just Peter Jackson trying to be clever, but now, because of those movies a lot of people are drawing him that way and browbeating others for not doing so.
But all in all PJ added so much to the Hobbit that wasn't supposed to be there, and distorted it so badly. I don't know if I'm going to see the next Hobbit movie, and I really hope they never make any Silmarillion movies. Someone needs to remind PJ that people are going to see the movies because of Tolkien, not because of him, and that he should stay true to the books. By the beard of Durin.
In general I am not too sanguine about movie adaptations of books, because they are often full of painful distortions due to the arrogance of the director, and I don't like seeing my beloved books distorted or dragged through the mud. I stopped seeing the Narnia movies for that reason. Too much pain involved there. All I can say is that at least it wasn't a Bible movie. Bible movies are often the worst, and that is something that people really do need to be careful about distorting.
My Comics Page:
Siblings:
Groups:
Places I frequent: